Anguilla

Lord Ashcroft: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Howell of Guildford on 15 November (WA 121), what is their assessment of the statement referred to, as reported in The Anguillian newspaper of 30 September.

Lord Howell of Guildford: We have seen the statement reported in the Anguillian newspaper on 30 September. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth office, my honourable friend the Member for North West Norfolk (Mr Bellingham) had a positive dialogue with the honourable Hubert Hughes, the Chief Minister of Anguilla at the annual ministerial meeting with political leaders from the overseas territories on 23 and 24 November. They agreed to continue to work closely together to tackle the challenges that Anguilla faces.

Armed Forces: Cadets

Lord West of Spithead: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether an education charity can access the Ministry of Defence's Community Fund for the purpose of benefiting United Kingdom cadets aged 13 to 16 and assisting them in gaining vocational qualifications; and, if so, how.

Lord Astor of Hever: The community covenant complements the Armed Forces covenant and is a voluntary statement of mutual support between a civilian community and its local Armed Forces community, which includes serving personnel, their families and veterans.
	The aims of the community covenant include: to encourage local communities to support the Armed Forces community in their areas, and vice versa; to promote understanding and awareness among the public of issues affecting the Armed Forces community; to recognise and remember the sacrifices made by the Armed Forces community; and to encourage activities which help to integrate the Armed Forces community into local life.
	Organisations, including education charities, can find out more about the Community Covenant Grant Scheme criteria as well as guidance and an application form on the Ministry of Defence website at: www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence/WhatWeDo/Personnel/Welfare/ArmedForcesCovenant/ArmedForcesCommunityCovenant.
	A copy has been placed in the Library of the House.

Belarus

Lord Ashcroft: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the statement issued by the International Democrat Union expressing their concerns about Belarus and the prosecution of Ales Bialiatski.

Lord Howell of Guildford: The Government share the International Democratic Union's deep concerns over the deterioration of human rights in Belarus. We continue to be at the forefront of efforts within the European Union and the wider international community to maintain political pressure on the Belarusian authorities to urge them to adhere to their human rights obligations. We have consistently called upon the Belarusian authorities to recognise the rule of law and democratic freedoms, free political prisoners and end human rights abuse. On 6 August, the Minister of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, my right honourable friend the member for Aylesbury (Mr Lidington) expressed his deep concern about the detention of human rights defender Ales Bialyatski and called on the Belarusian authorities "to ensure the rights and freedoms of all human rights defenders are fully upheld in accordance with the international treaties that the Government of Belarus has ratified".

British Council: Funding

Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne: To ask Her Majesty's Government how much the British Council spends on international development work by (a) country, and (b) theme.

Lord Howell of Guildford: The British Council plans to spend £146.7 million on international development work in 2011-12. This is divided by country as follows:
	
		
			 Country Total (£) 
			 Afghanistan 2,360,000 
			 Albania 227,000 
			 Algeria 1,267,000 
			 Argentina 600,000 
			 Armenia 337,000 
			 Azerbaijan 873,000 
			 Bangladesh 19,171,000 
			 Bosnia-Herzegovina 557,000 
			 Botswana 518,000 
			 Brazil 2,979,000 
			 Cameroon 666,000 
			 Chile 262,000 
			 China 9,795,000 
			 Colombia 2,124,000 
			 Croatia 655,000 
			 Cuba 189,000 
			 Democratic Rep Congo 665,000 
			 Egypt 2,914,000 
			 Eritrea 581,000 
			 Ethiopia 1,410,000 
			 Georgia 560,000 
			 Ghana 2,468,000 
			 India 14,199000 
			 Indonesia 3,086,000 
			 Iran 198,000 
			 Iraq 3,760,000 
			 Jamaica 72,000 
			 Jordan 1,502,000 
			 Kazakhstan 1,273,000 
			 Kenya 4,002,000 
			 Kosovo 390,000 
			 Lebanon 1,491,000 
			 Libya 1,651,000 
			 Macedonia 404,000 
			 Malawi 996,000 
			 Malaysia 2,112,000 
			 Mexico 1,828,000 
			 Morocco 1,203,000 
			 Mozambique 842,000 
			 Myanmar 1,384,000 
			 Namibia 467,000 
			 Nepal 410,000 
			 Nigeria 11,046,000 
			 Pakistan 9,982,000 
			 Palestinian Territories 2,354,000 
			 Philippines 499,000 
			 Rwanda 408,000 
			 Senegal 549,000 
			 Serbia & Montenegro 851,000 
			 Sierra Leone 2,655,000 
			 South Africa 3,350,000 
			 Sri Lanka 1,619,000 
			 Sudan 1,866,000 
			 Syria 2,752,000 
			 Tanzania 1,410,000 
			 Thailand 1,050,000 
			 Tunisia 701,000 
			 Turkey 3,440,000 
			 Uganda 1,888,000 
			 Ukraine 631,000 
			 Uzbekistan 527,000 
			 Venezuela 683,000 
			 Vietnam 2,425,000 
			 Yemen 1,084,000 
			 Zambia 1,038,000 
			 Zimbabwe 1,420,000 
			 Total 146,675,000 
		
	
	It is divided by theme as follows:
	education and society £121.2 million;English £20.8 million; andarts £4.7 million.
	The above figures cover international development work funded through contracts, partnerships and grant in aid.

Building Stability Overseas Strategy

Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will publish their annual assessment of countries at risk of violence, the early-warning system, as outlined in their Building Stability Overseas Strategy.

Baroness Northover: I refer the noble Baroness to my answer of 22 November 2011 (Official Report, Commons, col. 281W). The Building Stability Overseas Strategy explains that the early warning reports are underpinned by all-source analysis. This means they draw on a range of internal government reporting and cannot therefore be published for national security reasons.
	I also refer the noble Baroness to the answer of 22 November 2011 (Official Report. Commons, col. 273W) by the right honourable Andrew Robathan, Minister for Defence Personnel, Welfare and Veterans. The Building Stability Overseas Strategy (BSOS) was published jointly by the Ministry of Defence, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the Department for International Development in July 2011 and all three Secretaries of State announced they would share joint responsibility for its implementation. The strategy includes a new approach to turning early warning into early action. By focusing on early warning we will be able to improve our ability to anticipate instability and potential triggers for conflict thus increasing our opportunity to take fast, appropriate and effective action where necessary and where UK strategic interests are at stake.
	Early warning processes have been improved by drawing up a watch-list of fragile states comprised of countries that have a high risk of instability and are also of high interest to the UK. These states will be reviewed on a regular basis to ensure that all appropriate action is being taken to support the aims of the BSOS. The strategy makes clear that the watch-list is internal and both the watch-list and the early warning report draw on a range of internal HMG reporting and cannot therefore be published for security reasons. However, the BSOS is open about the criteria used to select countries for attention.

Burma

Baroness Goudie: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the humanitarian needs in ethnic areas of Burma where the Government restricts access by international agencies.

Baroness Northover: Humanitarian needs are considerable in many parts of Burma, and are particularly severe in areas of continuing conflict where access by international agencies may often be restricted. When he visited Burma from 15 to 17 November 2011, the Secretary of State for International Development pressed the Burmese President and his Ministers to move urgently towards a resolution to the ethnic conflicts and to increase humanitarian access in border areas. The Department for International Development is providing humanitarian aid through non-governmental organisations working from both Thailand and China to particularly vulnerable people in Burma's border areas who cannot be reached by local or international agencies from inside Burma.

Electoral Registration

Baroness McDonagh: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their latest estimate of the cost of implementing their proposals for individual electoral registration.

Lord McNally: The individual electoral registration White Paper published on 30 June 2011 estimated the costs of the move to individual registration as £108 million. We have dropped the previous Government's plans for a voluntary phase leading up to the introduction of individual electoral registration, saving £74 million.

Employment: Agency Workers

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Wilcox on 10 November (WA 82), whether the reports to the European Commission working group on the agency worker directive, on which they base their understanding that the majority of European Union member states that have transposed the directive have done so on the basis of day one equal treatment rights, are publicly available; and whether they will place them in the Library of the House.

Baroness Wilcox: The official report from the European Commission working group on the agency workers directive is a technical document and does not include the intentions of member states with regards to implementation: (http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=6998&langId=en).
	Our understanding of transposition in other member states was compiled by BIS officials attending the working group meetings and is based on oral reports made by representatives of the member states. Actual implementation will not be fully known until after the deadline for implementation across the EU (5 December 2011) and the Commission has carried out its review of implementation in (December 2013).

Energy: Nuclear Reactors

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass: To ask Her Majesty's Government what were the effects in the United Kingdom of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster; whether any long-term effects of that disaster remain; whether the nuclear reactor at Metsamor in Armenia is of identical or similar design to that which failed at Chernobyl; and, if so, whether they have any concerns about the safety of that reactor.

Lord Marland: Following the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986 a number of uplands in Scotland, Northern Ireland, England and Wales were subject to deposition of a number of radionuclide particles due to the weather conditions at the time. The environmental effects of the Chernobyl accident continue to be monitored as part of environmental monitoring for radioactivity. Such monitoring has been carried out across the UK annually for a number of years. There are still restrictions on moving, selling and slaughtering sheep in some upland areas of the UK. These was limited to 340 farms in 2010, compared with 9,700 farms following the accident in 1986. The restrictions on the two remaining farms in Scotland were lifted during 2010.
	The Armenian nuclear power plant at Metsamor is a similar Soviet-era design to the one at Chernobyl reactor in that it has no primary containment. The UK has supported the EU position that the reactor at Metsamor should be decommissioned as soon as possible while recognising the reliance of Armenia on the nuclear power plant for energy.

Energy: Nuclear Reactors

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass: To ask Her Majesty's Government with which international agencies that monitor nuclear reactors they co-operate; and whether they have made any representations to such agencies regarding the nuclear reactor at Metsamor in Armenia.

Lord Marland: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) undertakes a range of review services which look at the nuclear safety arrangements of its member states. As part of these services, at the invitation of the Armenian authorities, the IAEA completed an operational safety review of the nuclear power plant near Metsamor in June 2011. The mission noted a series of good practices and also made recommendations to reinforce them.
	The IAEA also undertakes international regulatory review service reviews which include the practical application of domestic legislation to nuclear power plants and the role of the regulators. While encouraging all IAEA member states to have IAEA review missions, most recently at the IAEA ministerial conference in June and again at the general conference in September, the UK has not specifically made representations about the need for an IRRS mission to Armenia.
	At the EU level the UK has supported the EU position that the reactor at Metsamor should be decommissioned as soon as possible while recognising the reliance of Armenia on the nuclear power plant for energy.

Energy: Policy

Lord Stoddart of Swindon: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether, in the light of reports that a new international climate change treaty is unlikely to be agreed before 2020, they will review their energy policy to ensure that the United Kingdom's competitive position is not adversely affected and energy consumers not penalised by the continuation of existing policies, especially in relation to increased reliance on wind farms to meet electricity demand.

Lord Marland: As my right honourable friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer has announced today, Government have launched a package of measures to support those energy-intensive industries whose international competitiveness is most affected by our energy and climate change policies. This underlines our commitment to ensure that manufacturing is able to remain competitive during the shift to a low carbon economy.
	For domestic consumers, our analysis published with the Annual Energy Statement 20111 estimates that in 2020 the average household bill will be 7 per cent or £94 lower than without the Government's energy and climate change policies.
	DECC regularly reviews its energy policies to maximise cost effectiveness and ensure value for money. For example, we are currently consulting on the support levels for renewable electricity generation technologies-including onshore and offshore wind-as part of the renewables obligation banding review.
	1 Estimated impacts of energy and climate change policies on energy prices and bills: http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/11/about-us/economics-social-research/3593-estimated-impacts-of-our-policies-on-energy-prices.pdf.

Equality and Human Rights Commission

Lord Boateng: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many local community relations and equality councils in receipt of funding by the Equality and Human Rights Commission are due to have that funding withdrawn; and which they are.

Baroness Verma: The Equality and Human Rights Commission's grant programmes are an operational matter for the commission. I have asked the chief executive to write to you regarding the information that you have requested.
	In March, we announced in our consultation Building a fairer Britain: Reform of the Equality and Human Rights Commission that we would stop funding the commission to provide its grants programmes when they come to a natural end, in the light of the findings of the Government's review of the commission's provision of equality information, advice and support.

EU: Credit Rating Agencies

Lord Myners: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Lord Sassoon on 15 November (Official Report, col. 676), what steps they have taken to foster competition in the provision of credit ratings in the United Kingdom; and whether they have made representations to the European Commission to refer credit ratings agencies to European competition authorities.

Lord Sassoon: As reflected in the Government's response to the European Commission's consultation document1, we have taken a pro-competitive stance in discussions on the development of credit rating agency regulation. As further explained in the spoken and written evidence provided to the House of Lords inquiry on sovereign debt, the Government take the view that efforts to reduce overreliance on credit rating agencies (CRA) ratings, increases in transparency and effective implementation of the registration system in Europe will reduce barriers to entry in the industry and foster competition.
	The Government and the Bank of England have been involved in the Financial Stability Board's ongoing work on reducing overreliance on CRA ratings. Previous CRA legislation agreed after the crisis (CRA1 and CRA2) has also encouraged competition. This is illustrated by 12 agencies other than the main three incumbents already having been registered in Europe. The final list is available at: http://www.esma.europa.eu/popup2.php? id=7692.
	The relevant competent competition authority in Europe is the European Commission, which released its latest set of legislative proposals on CRAs on 15 November. The proposals include measures to address competition, including increasing transparency and rotating CRAs between issuers. The proposals are available at: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/ securities/agencies/index_en.htm.
	1 Available at http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/securities/agencies/index_en.htm.

EU: Finance

Lord Myners: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they would oppose the introduction by the European Union of a financial activity charge levied as a regulatory cost offset and structured on an ad valorem basis.

Lord Sassoon: No such proposal has been tabled by the European Union.

EU: Taxation

Lord Myners: To ask Her Majesty's Government how they are engaging with the European Union on the necessary conditions for an effective financial transactions tax.

Lord Sassoon: The Government are not against financial transaction taxes (FTT) in principle, but believe that FTT should only be contemplated at a global level.

Government Departments: Buildings

Lord Kennedy of Southwark: To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to install photovoltaic solar systems on buildings owned or occupied by the Department for Communities and Local Government.

Baroness Hanham: My department has no current plans to install photovoltaic solar systems on its buildings, but we are working with the Department for Business Innovation and Skill's Technology Strategy Board to explore the benefits of new sustainable technology.
	We have already taken a series of measures to reduce the energy usage and CO2 emissions of the department's headquarters, Eland House. In June 2011, the building was awarded an "D" display energy certificate, improving on the "E" rating last year, and the notional "G" grade in 2006-07. As a result of these improvements, the department's energy bill has been reduced by £300,000 a year. By contrast, under the last Administration, this was one of the least energy-efficient buildings in Whitehall, despite it being the lead department on energy efficiency standards in buildings.
	Since May 2010, a range of measures has been introduced in line with advice from the display energy certificate to help meet lower energy use and CO2 targets-including installing more efficient lighting, aligning heating and cooling provision with Cabinet Office recommendations and by staff adopting lower carbon behaviours such as turning off office equipment when not in use.
	In addition, last year an online tool was launched so members of the public can at the click of a mouse see the energy use by the Department for Communities and Local Government for the first time.
	This is part of wider efforts to improve the energy efficiency of both domestic and commercial properties, to reduce CO2 emissions and save taxpayers' money.

Government Departments: Buildings

Lord Kennedy of Southwark: To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to install photovoltaic solar systems on buildings owned or occupied by the Cabinet Office.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to install photovoltaic solar systems on Numbers 10, 11 and 12 Downing Street.

Lord Wallace of Saltaire: The Prime Minster's Office forms an integral part of the Cabinet Office. The Cabinet Office currently has no plans to install photovoltaic solar systems on any of its buildings.

Heads of State: Official Visits

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government which heads of state have visited the United Kingdom on official or state visits in 2011.

Lord Howell of Guildford: The following heads of state have paid state visits or have visited the United Kingdom as guests of her Majesty's Government in 2011:
	President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan 28 February- 2 March 2011;President Barack Obama of The United States 23-26 May 2011 (state visit);President Traian Basescu of Romania 6-7 June 2011;President Boris Tadic of Serbia 15-16 November;President Juan Manuel Santos of Colombia 19-23 November 2011; and President Abdullah Gul of Turkey 20-24 November 2011 (state visit).

Health: Dementia

Baroness Greengross: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of (a) hospital admissions, and (b) emergency hospital admissions, on health outcomes for people with a diagnosis of dementia.

Earl Howe: We know that people with dementia stay longer in hospital and that there is room for improvement in the quality of their care. That is why improving the quality of care in general hospitals is one of the Government's four key priorities for improving dementia care services. We want to see people with dementia only admitted to hospital when absolutely necessary and, when they are in hospital, to receive high-quality care from staff trained to care for people with dementia.
	On 21 September 2011, following a year-long project funded by the department, the Royal College of Nursing launched a new commitment to the care of people with dementia in general hospitals. The commitment is a guide to promote a positive experience and support the delivery of dignified care for people living with dementia and their families, in hospital.

Housing

Baroness King of Bow: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many applicants were on the waiting list for the Seaside and Country Homes Scheme in each London borough in each year since 2004-05; and how many flats or bungalows became available to let under the Seaside and Country Homes Scheme in each of those years, broken down by county.

Baroness Hanham: This table shows the total number of households on the waiting list for the seaside and country homes scheme in the past three years. The department does not hold waiting list information before this date.
	
		
			 Year Total Households on Waiting List (local authority/housing association households) 
			 31 March 2010 1250 (local authority/housing association split not available) 
			 31 March 2011 1316 (716/600) 
			 31 October 2011 1175 (686/489) 
		
	
	The table below shows the number of households in local authority-owned properties seeking a move under the seaside and country homes scheme in 2010-11 and 2011-12, broken down by borough. The department does not hold waiting list information broken down by borough for households living in housing association-owned properties.
	
		
			  Number of Households on Waiting List 
			 Borough 31 March 2011 31 October 2011 
			 Barking and Dagenham 56 74 
			 Barnet 9 8 
			 Bexley 0 0 
			 Brent 3 5 
			 Bromley 1 1 
			 Camden 22 25 
			 City of London 12 7 
			 Croydon 27 28 
			 Ealing 20 17 
			 Enfield 19 16 
			 Greenwich 86 64 
			 Hackney 40 44 
			 Hammersmith and Fulham 16 13 
			 Haringey 17 17 
			 Harrow 10 9 
			 Havering 10 10 
			 Hillingdon 25 25 
			 Hounslow 25 22 
			 Islington 38 36 
			 Kensington and Chelsea 3 2 
			 Kingston-upon-Thames 8 6 
			 Lambeth 18 16 
			 Lewisham 30 30 
			 Merton 5 2 
			 Newham 45 49 
			 Redbridge 9 11 
			 Richmond-upon-Thames 1 2 
			 Southwark 79 75 
			 Sutton 18 19 
			 Tower Hamlets 24 20 
			 Waltham Forest 12 13 
			 Wandsworth 24 17 
			 Westminster 4 3 
			 Total 716 686 
		
	
	This table shows the number of flats and bungalows available to let since 2007-08, broken down by county. The department does not hold information about properties available before this date.
	
		
			  Number of Properties Available for Let 
			 County 31 March 2008 31 March 2009 31 March 2010 31 March 2011 31 October 2011 
			 Hampshire 21 15 22 20 14 
			 Sussex 25 30 49 33 38 
			 Kent 26 18 39 25 18 
			 IOW 6 5 8 6 5 
			 Wiltshire 7 6 4 2 3 
			 Suffolk 12 16 20 15 14 
			 Gloucestershire 0 2 1 3 0 
			 Essex 24 38 27 32 20 
			 Somerset 15 12 23 23 10 
			 Shropshire 1 3 6 4 3 
			 Dorset 11 7 3 6 4 
			 Norfolk 10 9 9 12 9 
			 Devon 2 4 6 10 3 
			 Lincolnshire 1 3 6 4 3 
			 Cornwall 2 4 6 3 5 
			 Cambridgeshire 3 4 5 0 0 
			 Berkshire 7 3 1 4 1 
			 Total 173 179 235 202 150 
		
	
	The seaside and country homes scheme supports better use of social housing stock in London by enabling households aged 60 and above to relocate to specific properties in other parts of the country. It was operated by MoveUK from 2004 to 2006. When that contract was terminated and the MoveUK scheme collapsed under the last Administration, it was then operated by DCLG, and subsequently transferred to the Greater London Authority from April 2011.
	I would add that this Government's new national HomeSwap Direct scheme will make it easier for tenants living in a council or housing association home to find a new property in another part of the country.
	HomeSwap Direct will mean that for the first time there will be a system in place across the whole of the United Kingdom. Tenants looking to move, whether for a job, to be near family or to a property better suited to their needs, will be able to see all the available homes across the whole of the country.

Housing

Lord Greaves: To ask Her Majesty's Government when decisions will be made on the allocation of transitional funding for the completion of schemes in former housing market renewal pathfinder areas.

Baroness Hanham: I refer the noble Lord to the Written Ministerial Statement made on 24 November (Official Report, col. WS 82-84).

Housing: Fire Safety

Lord Harrison: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hanham on 16 November (WA 157), other than promoting the importance of a working smoke alarm, what action they are taking to improve fire safety in (1) privately owned housing, and (2) social housing.

Baroness Hanham: I refer the noble Lord to the reply I gave to Lord Kennedy of Southwark on 16 December (WA 157).
	Working smoke alarm ownership remains at the heart of our efforts to reduce accidental fire deaths and injuries in the home. During 2011-12, we will continue to promote the key message to householders of having a working smoke alarm in their home, through the Fire Kills campaign.
	Furthermore, the UK Government welcome the referencing of the new safety standard for cigarettes which was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 17 November 2011. Based on DCLG research, we calculate that the impact of cigarettes that comply with this standard (in England) will save between 25-64 lives per year.

Israel

Baroness Tonge: To ask Her Majesty's Government what representations they have made to the Government of Israel concerning the arrest and detention of Dr Mazin Qumsiyeh and Mustafa Odeh.

Lord Howell of Guildford: We are aware that Dr. Mazin Qumsiyeh and Mr. Mustafah Odeh were arrested in November.
	The first arrest was on 13 November in Al-Walaja while the two individuals were filming Israeli soldiers gathered at the site of the security barrier. Both were released on the same day.
	Dr. Qumsiyeh was arrested again two days later with other five Palestinians when they boarded a bus travelling from the West Bank into Jerusalem. Dr. Qumsiyeh was released pending a trial and has been charged with "illegal entry to Jerusalem" and with "obstructing police business".
	We have not made any representations on these particular cases. Our embassy in Tel Aviv is monitoring the situation.

Israel and Palestine

Baroness Tonge: To ask Her Majesty's Government what representations they have made to the Government of Israel since the vote to admit Palestine to UNESCO concerning the withholding of taxes collected by Israel on behalf of the Palestinian Authority.

Lord Howell of Guildford: The Foreign Secretary, my right honourable friend, the Member for Richmond (Yorks) (Mr Hague) called on Israel to reverse its decision to withhold tax revenues on 3 November. In his Statement to Parliament on 9 November, he again condemned this decision, highlighting that it is provocative and against Israel's own interests, since it has direct implications for the Palestinian Authority's ability to maintain effective security in the West Bank.
	The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, my honourable friend the Member for North East Bedfordshire (Mr Burt) has outlined our concerns to Danny Ayalon, the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the State of Israel, on the 23 November.
	Our embassy in Tel Aviv has also made representations to the Government of Israel to release the funds.

Israel and Palestine

Baroness Tonge: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the cost to United Kingdom public funds of supporting Palestinians, arising from Israel's action in the West Bank since 1967.

Lord Howell of Guildford: As details are not held centrally, this information could be obtained only at disproportionate cost to public funds.

Israel and Palestine

Lord Hylton: To ask Her Majesty's Government what representations they have made to the Government of Israel regarding compensation for Palestinians attacked and injured by Israeli settlers.

Lord Howell of Guildford: We have discussed with the Israeli authorities settler violence and the impact it has on Palestinians in the Occupied Territories. We have encouraged the Israeli authorities to follow through on their stated commitment to bring perpetrators of settler violence to justice. We have not specifically raised the issue of compensation. We will continue to monitor the situation closely.

Israel and Palestine: West Bank

Baroness Tonge: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have received reports concerning segregation on buses between villages and settlements in the West Bank.

Lord Howell of Guildford: We are aware of recent action taken by groups of non-violent protesters to board buses transiting between settlements. Although there is not a de jure ban on Palestinians using them, there is a de facto block as they often start and finish in settlements that Palestinians are prevented from entering. We will continue to lobby the Government of Israel to make sure that all infrastructure projects and facilities in the Occupied Territories are for the benefit of the local population.

Israel and Palestine: West Bank

Lord Hylton: To ask Her Majesty's Government when they last made representations to the Government of Israel about the Yitz'har West Bank colony and the Bracha colony and their associated outposts; and with what result.

Lord Howell of Guildford: We regularly make clear that settlements, such as Yitzhar and Bracha, are illegal under international law and deeply unhelpful to efforts to bring a lasting peace to the Middle East conflict. The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, my right honourable friend the Member for Richmond (Yorks) (My Hague), the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, my honourable friend the Member for North East Bedfordshire (Mr Burt) and our ambassador in Tel Aviv have all raised the issue of settlements with the Israeli authorities. We have not made separate representations over these specific locations.
	The Foreign Secretary most recently condemned settlement activity publicly in his statements of 2 and 9 November:
	"Israel's announcement to accelerate the construction of 2,000 settlements housing units, in response to the successful Palestinian application for membership of UNESCO, is a serious blow to the quartet's efforts to restart peace negotiations. This settlement building programme is illegal under international law and is the latest in a series of provocative and unhelpful settlement announcements. I condemn the decision to accelerate such construction. ... We need to see steps towards peace, not actions that divide and isolate the parties further and undermine the prospects for negotiations". (2 November.)
	"Israel's announcement last week that it would accelerate the construction of 2,000 settlement housing units was wrong and deeply counter-productive. That was the eighth announcement of settlement expansion in six months. ... We call on Israel to revoke ... those decisions". (9 November.)

Israel and Palestine: West Bank

Lord Hylton: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact on family life, further education and emigration of travel restrictions on residents of East Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Palestinian diaspora.

Lord Howell of Guildford: We remain deeply concerned about the impact of travel restrictions on family life, further education and emigration.
	Palestinians from East Jerusalem risk losing their permanent right to live in East Jerusalem if they cannot prove residency for the previous seven years. Records show that more than 13,000 Palestinians have lost their Jerusalem residency status since the annexation by Israel in 1967, including students who have been studying abroad.
	Palestinians in the diaspora are not allowed to enter the Occupied Palestinians Territories without approval from the Israeli authorities. Since 2000 there has been a freeze on family reunification permits, despite more than 120,000 requests being submitted to the Palestinian Authority as of October 2005.
	We continue to monitor this situation closely and raise our concerns as necessary.

Israel and Palestine: West Bank

Lord Hylton: To ask Her Majesty's Government what representations they have made to the Government of Israel about the payment of compensation to shopkeepers in Hebron, who had their shops closed or their apartments seized by Israeli settlers; and, if so, how much.

Lord Howell of Guildford: We have not specifically raised the prospect of compensation for shopkeepers in Hebron. We remain concerned about evictions and demolitions of Palestinian property in the West Bank. The UK has a good record of lobbying hard on issues relating to house demolitions and settlement building.
	We view any attempts to change the facts on the ground as a serious provocation likely to raise tensions and cause unnecessary suffering to ordinary Palestinians, as well as being harmful to the peace process and in contravention of international law.

Ministry of Defence: Staff

Lord Lee of Trafford: To ask Her Majesty's Government what are the salaries of the six highest-paid civilian individuals currently employed by the Ministry of Defence.

Lord Astor of Hever: The salaries of the six highest-paid civilian individuals currently employed in the Ministry of Defence, shown in £5,000 bands, are:
	£220,000-224,999;
	£200,000-204,999;
	£180,000-184,999;
	£175,000-179,999; and
	£160,000-164,999 x 2.
	Four of these salaries, including the top two, are paid to senior fixed-term appointees, who have been recruited from outside the Civil Service for their specific skills which the department does not have. The other two salaries are paid to permanent senior civil servants on standard contracts.
	May I also refer my noble friend to the data available at http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence /CorporatePublications/FinancialReports/Salaries/ which, in accordance with the Government's transparency agenda contains details of salaries, in £5,000 bands, of all those at senior civil service pay band two level and above? This year's data are due to be uploaded at the end of November.
	A copy of the report will be placed in the Library of the House.

Pensions

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hill of Oareford on 31 October (WA 222), whether they will continue their policy of providing funding for employers' contributions for members of public sector pension schemes which open their membership to non-public sector employees.

Lord Sassoon: There are a limited number of non-public sector employers that have access to public service pension schemes. In these circumstances, employers and employees pay pension contributions for the pension benefits that are earned. Employer contributions are not directly funded by the Government.

Public and Private Sector: Salaries

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government what are the percentage differences in median full-time weekly earnings between the public sector and private sector for (1) the United Kingdom, (2) England, (3) Scotland, (4) Wales and (5) Northern Ireland; and what those figures are when the pension benefit provisions for each sector are incorporated.

Lord Wallace of Saltaire: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.
	Letter from Stephen Penneck, Director General for ONS, to Lord Laird, dated November 2011.
	As Director General for the Office for National Statistics, I have been asked to reply to your Parliamentary Question asking what are the percentage differences in median full-time weekly earnings between the public sector and private sector for (1) the United Kingdom, (2) England, (3) Scotland, (4) Wales and (5) Northern Ireland; and what those figures are when the pension benefit provisions for each sector are incorporated. (HL1 3729)
	Average levels of earnings are estimated from the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE), and are provided for all employees on adult rates of pay whose pay for the survey period was not affected by absence. The ASHE, carried out in April each year, is the most comprehensive source of earnings information in the United Kingdom and is based on a one per cent sample of employee jobs taken from HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) PAYE records.
	Although the ASHE collects data on occupational pension schemes and pension contributions, ASHE does not support the calculation of estimates for median full-time weekly earnings which incorporate pension benefit provisions.
	I attach a table showing the percentage differences in median full-time weekly earnings between the public sector and private sector for (1) the United Kingdom, (2) England, (3) Scotland, (4) Wales and (5) Northern Ireland for 2011, the latest period for which figures are available.
	
		
			 Percentage differences in median full-time weekly earnings between the Public sector and Private sector for, 2011 
			  Gross weekly pay £ 
			  Public Private Percentage difference 
			 UK 555.9 476.2 16.7 
			 England 559.2 481.9 16.0 
			 Scotland 559.4 448.2 24.8 
			 Wales 506.7 415.7 21.9 
			 Northern Ireland 557.9 394.2 41.5 
		
	
	a: Full-time employees on adult rates whose pay for the survey period was not affected by absence. As at April 2011.
	Source: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, Office for National Statistics.

Royal Mail: Commemorative Stamps

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will make representations to the postal authorities to ensure that the 200th anniversary of the Battle of Waterloo is marked by a special issue of stamps.

Baroness Wilcox: Decisions relating to the subject matter and designs ofstamps, are the direct responsibility of Royal Mail's management. Suggestions for topics for Royal Mail's stamps should be pursued direct with the company.
	Royal Mail is aware of the bicentenary of the Battle of Waterloo and it is on a long list of subjects under consideration for 2015. The company will not however be finalising decisions on the content of the 2015 stamp programme until 2013.
	Royal Mail has a well established process in place for selecting topics that celebrate or commemorate key national events or major achievements. The company receives over 2,000 suggestions each year and must reduce this number to around 12-14 special stamp set issues under any respective annual programme. Given the high demand it is inevitable that not all suggestions can be taken up.

Schools: Teachers

Lord Ashcroft: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many sick days teachers in maintained schools have taken, by local authority, in the past year.

Lord Hill of Oareford: Information on the number of sick days taken by teachers in the academic year 2010-11 is expected to become available in spring 2012.
	For the academic year 2009-10 the number of sick days taken by teachers employed in publicly funded schools by local authority in England in November 2010 is provided in the table below.
	
		
			 Full and Part-Time Teacher Sickness Absence in Publicly Funded Schools 
			 Year: Academic year 2009-10 
			 Coverage: England 
			  Teacher Absence 
			 Number LA Percentage of Teachers with at Least One Period of Sickness Absence (%) Total Number of Days Lost to Sickness Absence Average (Mean) Number of Days Lost to Teacher Sickness Absence (only Teachers in School Taking Sickness Absence) Average Number of Days Lost to Teacher Sickness Absence (All Teachers in School) 
			 England1 52 2,277,700 4.2 8.2 
			 201 City of London 45 - 1.4 30 
			 202 Camden 50 6,500 3.6 7.2 
			 203 Greenwich 55 11,500 3.9 7.0 
			 204 Hackney 50 8,800 3.8 7.7 
			 205 Hammersmith and Fulham 47 3,900 2.6 5.4 
			 206 Islington 56 7,500 4.0 7.1 
			 207 Kensington and Chelsea 48 2,500 2.7 5.6 
			 208 Lambeth 50 9,100 3.4 6.8 
			 209 Lewisham 55 9,600 4.3 7.7 
			 210 Southwark 54 10,300 3.7 6.9 
			 211 Tower Hamlets 64 14,800 4.5 7.0 
			 212 Wandsworth 52 8,800 3.3 6.4 
			 213 Westminster 46 5,300 2.9 6.2 
			 301 Barking and Dagenham 56 12,100 4.9 8.9 
			 302 Barnet 43 11,700 3.0 6.9 
			 303 Bexley 50 11,600 4.4 8.8 
			 304 Brent 51 10,900 3.4 6.6 
			 305 Bromley 52 11,100 3.4 6.6 
			 306 Croydon 44 11,500 2.9 6.6 
			 307 Ealing 49 11,500 3.4 7.1 
			 308 Enfield 54 15,200 4.0 7.5 
			 309 Haringey 61 12,400 5.1 8.4 
			 310 Harrow 55 8,100 3.8 6.9 
			 311 Havering 50 9,500 3.6 7.1 
			 312 Hillingdon 57 12,000 3.7 6.6 
			 313 Hounslow 50 10,000 3.5 7.2 
			 314 Kingston upon Thames 52 5,600 3.2 6.1 
			 315 Merton 54 5,600 3.4 6.2 
			 316 Newham 60 17,200 4.8 8.0 
			 317 Redbridge 48 11,800 3.3 69 
			 318 Richmond upon Thames 39 3,300 2.3 5.9 
			 319 Sutton 50 7,900 3.3 6.7 
			 320 Waltham Forest 59 12,000 4.5 7.7 
			 330 Birmingham 60 61,900 5.1 8.5 
			 331 Coventry 51 17,100 4.7 9.3 
			 332 Dudley 57 14,700 4.8 8.4 
			 333 Sandwell 55 16,600 4.7 8.6 
			 334 Solihull 52 11,400 4.3 8.3 
			 335 Walsall 48 24,800 8.4 17.7 
			 336 Wolverhampton 53 13,400 4.7 8.8 
			 340 Knowsley 57 7,200 4.7 8.3 
			 341 Liverpool 47 20,200 4.4 9.5 
			 342 St Helens 49 7,400 4.8 9.8 
			 343 Sefton 55 13,900 4.7 8.7 
			 344 Wirral 44 14,500 3.9 87 
			 350 Bolton 50 10,400 3.8 7.7 
			 351 Bury .. .. .. .. 
			 352 Manchester 48 17,900 4.1 8.4 
			 353 Oldham 49 11,800 4.7 9.6 
			 354 Rochdale 49 11,300 5.2 10.6 
			 355 Salford 48 4,900 3.5 7.1 
			 356 Stockport 46 10,300 3.6 7.9 
			 357 Tameside 40 7,800 3.3 8.2 
			 358 Trafford 47 7,300 3.3 7.0 
			 359 Wigan 42 11,300 3.4 8.1 
			 370 Barnsley 56 12,900 6.0 10.7 
			 371 Doncaster 54 16,000 4.9 9.1 
			 372 Rotherham 49 11,300 3.6 7.2 
			 373 Sheffield 52 24,300 4.7 9.0 
			 380 Bradford 56 30,800 5.0 8.9 
			 381 Calderdale 51 11,600 4.9 9.6 
			 382 Kirklees .. .. .. .. 
			 383 Leeds 47 24,000 3.6 7.6 
			 384 Wakefield 46 12,100 3.8 8.3 
			 390 Gateshead 47 8,300 3.9 8.4 
			 391 Newcastle upon Tyne 52 11,900 4.6 8.9 
			 392 North Tyneside 60 9,000 4.8 8.0 
			 393 South Tyneside 48 4,300 3.8 7.9 
			 394 Sunderland 51 18,900 6.2 12.3 
			 420 Isles of Scilly 39 100 3.3 8.3 
			 800 Bath and North East Somerset 51 6,300 3.4 6.6 
			 801 Bristol City of 53 15,400 4.1 7.8 
			 802 North Somerset 49 7,800 3.9 8.1 
			 803 South Gloucestershire 53 11,800 4.0 7.5 
			 805 Hartlepool 48 5,800 5.5 11.6 
			 806 Middlesbrough 57 11,600 7.0 12.3 
			 807 Redcar and Cleveland 41 4,500 3.0 7.4 
			 808 Stockton-on-Tees 39 6,600 3.3 8.6 
			 810 Kingston-upon-Hull City of 46 10,400 4.0 8.7 
			 811 East Riding of Yorkshire 38 11,200 3.4 8.9 
			 812 North East Lincolnshire 48 6,900 4.4 9.1 
			 813 North Lincolnshire 50 7,500 4.6 9.2 
			 815 North Yorkshire 55 34,900 6.1 11.1 
			 816 York .. .. .. .. 
			 821 Luton 53 10,000 4.5 8.5 
			 822 Bedford 47 7,100 3.9 8.4 
			 823 Central Bedfordshire 45 12,700 3.9 8.7 
			 825 Buckinghamshire 44 19,300 3.2 7.2 
			 826 Milton Keynes 52 11,300 3.6 6.9 
			 830 Derbyshire 44 22,700 3.2 7.2 
			 831 Derby 61 11,400 5.0 8.1 
			 835 Dorset 49 13,200 3.3 6.8 
			 836 Poole 62 6,200 5.0 8.1 
			 837 Bournemouth 51 7,100 5.1 9.9 
			 840 Durham .. .. .. .. 
			 841 Darlington 47 4,300 4.6 9.7 
			 845 East Sussex 54 17,100 3.8 7.0 
			 846 Brighton and Hove 53 8,700 3.9 7.4 
			 850 Hampshire 52 53,800 4.5 8.6 
			 851 Portsmouth 57 10,000 5.8 10.1 
			 852 Southampton 58 9,400 4.6 7.8 
			 855 Leicestershire 52 26,000 3.9 7.5 
			 856 Leicester 53 15,700 4.4 8.3 
			 857 Rutland 45 700 2.5 5.4 
			 860 Staffordshire 51 44,900 5.2 10.2 
			 861 Stoke-on-Trent 42 8,000 3.6 8.4 
			 865 Wiltshire 47 15,600 3.2 6.8 
			 866 Swindon 48 7,300 3.6 7.5 
			 867 Bracknell Forest 59 3,200 3.4 5.7 
			 868 Windsor and Maidenhead 45 4,100 2.8 6.4 
			 869 West Berkshire 55 7,500 3.8 6.9 
			 870 Reading 48 4,300 3.1 6.5 
			 871 Slough 56 7,200 3.8 6.8 
			 872 Wokingham 53 5,800 3.2 6.1 
			 873 Cambridgeshire 53 20,900 3.8 7.3 
			 874 Peterborough 51 8,400 4.1 8.1 
			 876 Halton 36 4,300 3.5 9.7 
			 877 Warrington 49 8,700 4.0 8.2 
			 878 Devon 50 25,500 3.5 7.0 
			 879 Plymouth 53 12,700 4.7 8.9 
			 880 Torbay 56 6,400 4.7 8.3 
			 881 Essex 51 54,100 4.0 7.8 
			 882 Southend-on-Sea 49 8,400 3.9 8.0 
			 883 Thurrock 49 7,200 4.8 9.7 
			 884 Herefordshire 42 4,900 3.2 7.5 
			 885 Worcestershire 53 27,200 4.7 8.8 
			 886 Kent 48 59,000 3.5 7.4 
			 887 Medway 50 11,600 4.1 8.2 
			 888 Lancashire 46 52,400 4.4 9.5 
			 889 Blackburn with Darwen 43 4,200 2.7 6.2 
			 890 Blackpool 60 8,700 6.2 10.4 
			 891 Nottinghamshire 50 36,400 4.3 8.6 
			 892 Nottingham 56 12,200 4.4 7.9 
			 893 Shropshire 47 17,500 5.5 11.8 
			 894 Telford and Wrekin .. .. .. .. 
			 895 Cheshire East 46 13,900 3.7 8.2 
			 896 Cheshire West and Chester 47 12,900 3.8 8.0 
			 908 Cornwall 51 22,000 4.3 8.4 
			 909 Cumbria 50 22,900 4.7 9.5 
			 916 Gloucestershire 43 19,900 3.0 7.0 
			 919 Hertfordshire 44 43,900 3.0 6.9 
			 921 Isle of Wight 49 5,500 4.1 8.4 
			 925 Lincolnshire 51 38,000 5.7 11.1 
			 926 Norfolk 53 32,800 4.4 8.3 
			 928 Northamptonshire 50 31,900 4.2 8.4 
			 929 Northumberland 38 15,200 3.3 8.6 
			 931 Oxfordshire 47 21,100 3.2 6.9 
			 933 Somerset 47 17,000 3.4 7.3 
			 935 Suffolk 42 23,700 3.1 7.3 
			 936 Surrey 47 32,300 3.1 6.5 
			 937 Warwickshire 46 19,900 3.6 7.8 
			 938 West Sussex 52 29,100 3.9 7.5 
		
	
	Source: School Workforce Census
	1 The overall figures for England includes estimates for local authorities that are not available and therefore the sum of the days lost in each local authority will not equal this total.
	.. Not available
	- Nil or negligible
	The information provided is from the school workforce census that was collected for the first time in November 2010.
	Further information on teacher sickness absence, including national historical comparisons, is published in table 18 in the Statistical First Release School Workforce in England, November 2010 available at the following link: http://wwweducation.gov.uk/researchandstatistics/statistics/allstatistics/a00l96713/school-workforce-sfr.

Social Fund

Baroness King of Bow: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Freud on 11 Oct (WA 229), which part of the responses by Homeless Link and the National Association of Welfare Rights Advisers to the March 2010 consultation on reform of the Social Fund justify the claim that these organisations support the provision of goods and services instead of cash for Community Care Grants.

Lord Freud: The department interpreted the responses given to question 7 to the March 2010 consultation by Homeless Link and National Association of Welfare Rights Advisers as broadly supportive.
	As stated in my previous answer 10 of the 17 respondents had reservations, this included Homeless Link and National Association of Welfare Rights Advisers.

Sri Lanka

Lord Avebury: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the extent to which the Government of Sri Lanka, the United Nations Secretary-General and the United Nations Human Rights Council have implemented each of the recommendations made by the Panel of Experts on Sri Lanka; and whether they will place in the Library of the House a copy of any such assessment.

Lord Howell of Guildford: We welcomed the publication of the United Nations (UN) Panel of Expert's report and encouraged Sri Lanka to act on the report's recommendations. Sri Lankan officials have informed us that the report of the Sri Lankan Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) will address the material within the UN panel's report. The LLRC's report was handed to the Sri Lankan president on 20 November and we have urged the Sri Lankan Government to make it public at the earliest opportunity.
	On 12 September the UN Secretary-General submitted the report to the president of the UN Human Rights Council. The Secretary-General also announced on 24 September that Thoraya Obaid, former executive director of the UN Population Fund, would implement the recommendation that the UN reviews its own role during the military conflict.

State Recognition

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether their criteria for recognising a country include human rights; and, if not, why.

Lord Howell of Guildford: I refer the noble Lord to my answer of 13 May 2011 (Official Report, col. WA 250).

Syria

Baroness Tonge: To ask Her Majesty's Government what representations they have made to the Government of Syria regarding reports of alleged organ trafficking from opponents of the regime in Syria.

Lord Howell of Guildford: We are aware of reports in the media that organs have been removed from opponents of the Syrian regime. If confirmed this would be an abominable crime and those responsible should be brought to account.
	The United Nations estimates that more than 3,500 people have been killed in Syria since March, including 187 children. It has reported widespread and systematic human rights violations, including murder, summary executions, tens of thousands of detentions and torture.
	At the Universal Periodic Review on Syria at the UN Human Rights Council on 7 October, the UK raised the Syrian regime's systematic torture, rape and the arbitrary detention of thousands of men, women and children. We called for an immediate end to all human rights violations against civilians in relation to their peaceful exercise of freedom of expression and assembly.
	On 22 November the UN General Assembly passed a UK/French/German proposed resolution on human rights in Syria. The resolution was co-sponsored by 62 countries including Jordan, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and Turkey was passed by a large majority (122 in favour). It called on the Syrian Government to end violence and implement the Arab League's plan of action without delay.

Syria

Lord Stoddart of Swindon: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether, in their discussions with representatives of the Syrian opposition, they have ruled out any commitment to supply arms or any logistical support to assist them in their attempts to unseat the present regime.

Lord Howell of Guildford: The Government have made no commitment to provide arms or any logistical support to assist the Syrian opposition in their attempts to unseat the present regime.
	The Foreign and Commonwealth Office is engaging with a wide range of Syrian oppositionists inside and outside the country and is encouraging them to maintain a peaceful and non-sectarian approach. We welcome the opposition efforts to unite and provide a clearly defined, shared vision for the future of Syria. We are encouraging Syrian opposition groups to work together towards a Syria which will be democratic, inclusive, representative, respectful of its ethnic and religious minorities, and which will adhere to international human rights conventions.

Syria and Bahrain

Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Howell of Guildford on 14 September (WA 78-79), what is their "practical assessment" of the situation on the ground in Syria and Bahrain.

Lord Howell of Guildford: The United Nation's latest assessment is that regime violence against civilians continues despite the Syrian Government's agreement to an Arab League peace plan. They estimate that over 3,500 people, including 187 children, have been killed and many thousands have been detained since the protests started in March 2011. The most recent unsubstantiated reports estimate that over 300 people have been killed during November alone.
	We support the Arab League in its efforts to bring about an end to the killing of Syrian people. The UK has been at the forefront of international action to increase pressure on the Syrian regime to stop the repression. On 22 November an United Nations General Assembly resolution, co-sponsored by 62 countries, including a number of Arab countries, was passed with wide support (122 countries voted in favour) sending a signal of united condemnation of the Syrian regime's systematic human rights abuses. The resolution calls on the Syrian Government to end the appalling violence and implement the Arab League's plan of action without delay. As long as the crisis in Syria continues the international pressure on the Assad regime will only intensify.
	In the European Union (EU), the UK has been instrumental in imposing nine rounds of EU sanctions against 74 individuals and 19 entities, targeting those supporting or benefiting from the regime and those associated with them. Most recently the EU listed further military, security and intelligence officials leading military operations in Syria. In addition, the EU has moved to prevent any further disbursement of loans from the European Investment Bank to Syria.
	We welcome the publication of the Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry report on 23 November and His Majesty King Hamad of Bahrain's acceptance of the Government's shortcomings during the unrest earlier this year. As the Foreign Secretary, my right honourable friend the Member for Richmond (Yorks) (Mr Hague) expressed in his Statement, we have stressed our series concerns about the human rights situation in Bahrain and made it clear that this must urgently be addressed. The report provides an opportunity for the Government and all opposition groups to demonstrate their commitment to reconciliation and contribute to the process of political renewal. Constructive dialogue and effective implementation of reforms remain the best way to bring long-term stability to Bahrain.

Taxation: Corporation Tax

Lord Lucas: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether current arrangements for corporate taxation cover the trade that internet-based multinationals carry out in the United Kingdom.

Lord Sassoon: Internet-based companies trading in the UK are subject to tax on their profits in the same way as any other company operating in the UK.

UK Trade and Investment

Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne: To ask Her Majesty's Government what formal process they undertook to decide their 20 priority high-growth and emerging markets in their five-year strategy Britain Open for Business.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Green of Hurstpierpoint on 15 September (WA 92), what is their "well established set of criteria" for allocating resources to overseas markets.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have decided on the exact level of additional personnel and finance resources they will allocate to the 20 priority high-growth and emerging markets identified in their five-year strategy Britain Open for Business.

Lord Green of Hurstpierpoint: The 20 priority high-growth markets identified in Britain Open for Business were identified by analysis undertaken by UK Trade and Investment, working with the FCO, using criteria including:
	market size and potential for growth;the Government's assessment of their strategic political and economic importance; an assessment of the security situation;strength of scientific, technical and research base;performance of UK businesses relative to competitors;market match with UK capability, and the presence of active local partners keen to strengthen trading links with the UK.
	These criteria enabled us to assess the importance of a market, the potential for growth, and the need for the Government to help British business interests.
	The strategy for UKTI's overseas footprint is then determined by this assessment, and also by:
	the demand for our services from UK businesses;an evaluation of the productivity of our teams;how we can deliver more through private sector partners, such as the China-Britain Business Council, the UK-India Business Council, and the UK-ASEAN Business Council, which is currently being established; andthe network shift of FCO resources to emerging powers announced by the Foreign Secretary in May 2011 which will include: strengthening front-line staff in China by up to 50, and in India by 30; a substantial expansion in Brazil, Turkey, Mexico and Indonesia; and additional staff in a number of other emerging powers.
	My right honourable friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer has today announced that UKTI will double to 50,000 the number of companies it helps to export each year. A very substantial proportion of these will be trading with the top 20 growth markets. UKTI will plan to focus sufficient resources on these markets in order to deliver on this ambition.